Saturday, April 12, 2025

Flooded Zone

The tipping point for this post was a required online training for work.  It was a refresher on Title IX and the Clery Act.  Two things stood out from last time I took the training.  The first was an advisory to clear my browsing history afterward.  The second was the “safety exit” button present on every page.

I suspect these warnings were meant for my colleagues on their work computers.  (I took the training on my personal laptop.)  The company administering the class is a contractor which probably operates in states other than my own.  What this tells me is that we are now at a point where workers have to be warned to cover their tracks after receiving DEI training.

The last ten weeks have been surreal.  I originally meant to write about Signalgate, then the deportations to hellhole prisons in El Salvador, then the economic whipsaw of the tariffs.  Now I’m left trying to take it all in.

Like millions of people, I have seen a good portion of my net worth vanish into the ether over the past two weeks.  After a lifetime following the conventional financial wisdom of saving for retirement by investing in equities, it’s likely that none of us will fully recoup our losses.  I’m rethinking my summer travels over concerns over being able to leave the country or return to it.  More than before, I am self-censoring.

One thing I’ve noticed is the lessened prominence of rank-and-file MAGA in media coverage.  Sure, you still see plenty of red trucker hats in the wild, but you see more reporting about Elon and RFK Jr.’s antics or the obsequiousness of public officials and media when appearing in public with the president.  (On the other hand, a student told me about an incident she saw at one of last weekend’s “Hands Off” demonstrations.  She related that a man driving a pickup truck with the obligatory Trump flag flying from the bed came to a sudden halt.  He then got out and punched the first protestor he came to before getting back in and speeding off.)

I think I can say with certainty that the “flooding the zone” approach is working.  Meanwhile, the apologists look at the pointless chaos and tell us to “trust the plan,” and that Trump is playing 4-D chess. (Honestly, I think tiddlywinks would be too complicated for him.)  They don’t notice or acknowledge that real people are being hurt, some of whom voted for Trump last November. 

I think back on the last ten years as unimaginable at their onset.  I grapple with how to explain this moment when it’s my job to do just that.  And I ponder what the world after will look like.

 

© 2025 The Unassuming Scholar

Friday, February 28, 2025

Calamities

I’ve spent the past weeks wondering which outrageous act would prompt me to write about Trump 2.0.  Keeping up with the firehose gush of ratfuckery emanating from Washington is exhausting and demoralizing.

Today’s televised White House meeting between Trump, J. D. Vance, and Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky was the tipping point.  The meeting degenerated into a shouting match where Trump and Vance scolded Zelensky for being insufficiently grateful to Trump.

It should go without mention that Trump and Vance’s conduct was beneath the dignity of the American presidency.  But so has so much of what has transpired since January 20th.  Elon Musk’s gang of teenaged incel tech-bros hiding behind an imaginary government agency randomly wrecking actual government agencies is probably the worst of them.  The dismantling of USAID alone will diminish our standing in the global community.  Our holding NATO at arm’s length will do the same.  Cuts to Medicaid will imperil the health of millions of economically vulnerable Americans.

Just as troubling is Trump’s slavish sucking up to Vladimir Putin.  Putin was undoubtedly the target audience for this morning’s public dressing down of President Zelensky.  This, coming on the heels of Trump’s repeated assertions that Ukraine was the aggressor in its war of with Russia, was a perverse form of virtue signaling to ingratiate himself with Putin. 

Then there are the more mundane policy proposals, particularly tariffs.  In the fantasies of the MAGA-verse, these will be a “Take that!” to our imagined rivals.  In reality, they will drive up the price of imported everyday commodities.  Tariffs will also provoke retaliatory tariffs, dampening the market for U.S.-made goods.  Then again, few in the base will believe that rising prices will be the fault not of tariffs but of—take your pick—Biden, congressional Democrats, irresponsible blue-state governors, DEI, ad nauseum.

The media are falling eerily in line this time around.  Not that they have a choice.  First, the Associated Press was banished from the White House press pool over the AP’s insistence in calling the Gulf of Mexico…the Gulf of Mexico.  Then, the White House press office wrested selection of the reporters in the press pool from the White House Correspondents’ Association.  The confrontational, occasionally belligerent demeanor of MAGA Barbie press secretary Karoline Leavitt does little to ease media relations.

The squeezing out of mainstream news services is accelerating.  Fox News Channel has long been the most-watched of the cable news nets.  Fox and the popularity of alt-right outlets appear to be incrementally taking control of the national narrative.  Really, the dominant message taking hold is little more than a string of tropes.  Here is the right’s narrative reduced to a few words: A mob of trans drag queens, along with the illegals, will descend upon Real Americans to take their Bibles and guns while grooming their kids in woke ideology.

Or maybe it is more than making the world scary for the base.  While inflation is slowing, prices are sticky.  The received wisdom since November 5th is that voters were attracted to Trump because the Democrats had not done enough to make daily life affordable.  Sounds true.  Probably true. 

In closing, I have just one question for those non-MAGA voters who went with Trump last November.

Still worried about the cost of eggs?

 

 

© 2025 The Unassuming Scholar

Sunday, January 19, 2025

Day Zero

It begins all over again tomorrow.  It seems almost a sacrilege that this inauguration day happened to fall on Martin Luther King Day.

The silver lining is that due to the mourning period for President Carter, the flags will be at half-staff.

Tuesday, December 31, 2024

Reckonings

I have been a poor correspondent lately.  Cascading current events and work have distracted me.  So, for what it’s worth I will write down some musings at the end of the year.

Summer and fall were unusually unsettled, even by the political standards of the last ten years.  Joe Biden’s befuddled performance in the July presidential debate, his withdrawal, the sudden spot of hope of the Harris-Walz campaign, to the somehow predictable debacle on November 5th, the second half of 2024 delivered on the worst pessimist’s expectations.  Now, as in 2016, we look upon an uncertain and turbulent future.

Donald Trump’s promises of revenge and retribution have renewed the long-simmering animus among the base.  As with any one of his past vows, this will not be what the Trumpers are expecting.  But we are already seeing manifestations of hatred among the less stable Trump followers.  Last week’s stalking and assault of a nonwhite TV reporter in Colorado by a taxi driver is likely the shape of things to come. 

According to news reports, the assailant followed the reporter’s news van for 40 miles to attack him in the station’s parking lot.  Claiming to have been a marine, the attacker demanded to know if the reporter was a citizen and proclaimed his self-alleged veteran status entitled him to police illegal immigrants.  At one point during the incident, he yelled, “This is Trump’s America!”

Yes, it is.  The confrontation is on-brand.  It is reminiscent of any one of similar incidents in the lead-up to and during Trump’s first presidency.  The assailant’s booking mugshot is familiar, reflecting a sad sack whose scant sense of self-worth is entirely rooted in his identification with Trump.

I’m speculating, of course, but I’m probably right just the same.  What to make of this episode?  Is it MAGA re-ascendant?  Is it the return of the cosplayers claiming authority over others they do not possess?  A case of stolen valor?  Or, is it just a case of an emotionally disturbed person acting out?

Doesn’t matter.  To the disappointment of people on the right and left, we most likely will not see widespread mass violence.  The rule of law, though weakened, has not disappeared.  What we can expect instead are a few dead, a number of injured, and millions in property damage at the hands of the worst MAGA nuts.  Some of them will be held accountable by the legal system, some will not.    

Each of these potential defendants will have their own story, but there will be certain themes in their self-justification.  They will say that President Trump “deputized” them to do what they did.  They will cite nonexistent or spurious legal doctrines.  They will claim persecution by the deep state.  If they identify as veterans, real or phony, they will say they were upholding their oath to defend the country.

(An aside is in order.  Many of these oath claimants were discharged years ago, releasing them from said oaths.  Any attempts to leverage their three years in the E-4 mafia to gain acquittal should not be acknowledged or allowed by the court.)

The extent to which any of these defenses will be taken seriously depends on political sentiment in the jurisdiction where the case is tried.  On a certain level, these will be mere media diversions. The incoming administration’s real damage will be on the policy level.

The immediate threat will be to immigrants.  The promised mass roundups and deportations are logistically infeasible in the short term, but four years is a long time.  Trump’s promise to end birth citizenship won’t pass the constitutional smell test, but the administration could make life miserable for the U.S. citizen children of migrant parents.  Other policy questions will stall for the time being.  There won’t be any progress on gun safety.  Reproductive rights, such that remain, are probably okay for now at the state level, and any proposed constitutional amendment banning abortion will not achieve the supermajority needed in both houses of Congress.

Foreign policy is another area that could harm the country internationally and at home.  Withholding funds from NATO is worrisome in light of the ongoing war in Ukraine.  (It seems Mr. Trump has forgotten that NATO was here for us in the immediate aftermath of 9/11.  It’s good to have friends.)  North Korea requires careful handling, something beyond the incoming top policymakers.  The proposed tariffs will only hurt ordinary Americans dependent on affordable consumer goods. 

Then there is the roster of amateurs proposed for the cabinet and other higher-level posts. Personal loyalty is a more important criterion than qualifications or competence.  No one knows for certain what sort of influence, if any, that the Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025 will have on the new administration’s policy choices but if even a small part of these get enacted it will have a deleterious impact on the public. 

It is at times like these where a crystal ball would be most helpful.  We can comfort ourselves that it’s only four years, but a lot of damage can be done in that brief span.  Destruction is easier than construction and much more lasting.

 

© 2024 The Unassuming Scholar

Wednesday, November 6, 2024

Aftermath

 There is little to say.  We are truly fucked.  Welcome back to the Trumpocalypse.

Tuesday, July 16, 2024

One of Us

This week’s Republican National Convention has so far yielded few surprises.  Donald Trump secured his third successive presidential nomination.  Trump’s naming of U.S. Senator J. D. Vance as his running mate did not raise eyebrows either since the freshman senator was already shortlisted.

Vance’s comparatively brief public career has reflected an interesting but also unsurprising evolution.  His 2016 memoir, Hillbilly Elegy, painted a bleak picture of the lives of Appalachian transplants in Ohio.  Vance’s personal biography is presented as a paradox: A career in venture capital preceded by Yale Law School by way of Ohio State University and the Marine Corps.  The book made him a media darling, an overnight pundit on the state of poor whites.  A voice from the people who made good, one of us as it were.  Vance was a Never-Trumper that election year, at one point tempting Godwin by speculating Trump might be a latter-day Hitler.

His election to the Senate in 2022 showed that Vance, like the Republican establishment, had “evolved” on the topic of Trump.  Trump endorsed Vance, who defeated his opponent, Tim Ryan, by a healthy but unimpressive margin.  Once in office, he fell into line.  It paid off.

Vance’s positions have been variously described as national conservative to populist.  He’s certainly a social conservative; the Heritage Foundation favored Vance as a candidate.  His stated policy positions align quite well with its Project 2025 plan.  While never liberal in his beliefs, he appeared a run of the mill conservative before he actually went into politics.  To repeat, he fell into line.

Thus Vance’s views are alarming should he ever be in a position to act on them.  It’s quite possible; the 39-year-old Vance is nearly half Trump’s age.  Even if Trump completes his term, some of the editorial commentary has already anointed Vance as the heir to MAGA and he’s in scoring position for the 2028 nomination.

This week’s RNC solidifies a years-long trend.  The Republican Party is wholly the Party of Trump.  That’s the choice.  With Biden’s obvious lapses and stubborn refusal to step aside as candidate, we have seen the future after November 5th. 

 

© 2024 The Unassuming Scholar

Sunday, July 14, 2024

Something Like This

Something like this was bound to happen.  Yesterday’s assassination attempt on Donald Trump is yet another manifesting of the roiling stream of violence churning beneath the surface of American life. 

It could have been worse.  But for the quick reaction to shots fired from outside the crowd by the Secret Service the incident would have joined a sordid history of political murder in this country.  It is bad enough an innocent bystander at the Pennsylvania rally died and two others were injured.  It is a sobering thought to know that even with extensive security precautions a would-be killer can come within millimeters of taking down a president.

Naturally the intended target immediately grasped the optics of his near-miss.  Blood trickling from his injured ear, Trump greeted the crowd with an upraised fist as his bodyguards hustled him away.  Predictably, he attributed his deliverance to God.  Millions of others undoubtedly believe this.  The attempt also serves to further the shared sense of grievance and need for a martyr among the base.

As time goes on the thread of our political narrative becomes snagged.  Presidential elections used to be routine affairs; they came, they went.  There were occasional complications, as in the case of the 2000 election, but for almost a half century most passed without incident.  Perhaps we should have seen it coming with the Tea Party movement, but the surprise outcome of 2016 remains just that.  More accurately, it was an all-around surprise at the time but has become a divinely ordained event to Trump’s more fervent supporters.    

Given that last tenet, the public reaction to the incident is as expected.  Commentators from the left expressed relief the attempt failed.  From the right, the rhetoric from Trump’s opponents was to blame.  As for the shooter, little is known at present other than his name, his age, and a few biographical tidbits.  He is reported to have been a registered Republican who also made a small contribution to a liberal group, but neither fact really has any bearing on what he did.  The demographics track; he was a twentysomething white male.  But his motive is a mystery.

It's certain that Trump’s brush with death will pervade the discourse at next week’s Republican National Convention.  It will likely become a theme in campaign media as we near the election.  Perhaps it will have an effect on undecided voters.  Trump’s sangfroid does enhance his image.  Whether this will be the case several weeks from now remains to be seen.  But the fact that something like this has happened is an ominous sign of our polarization.

 

© 2024 The Unassuming Scholar