Sunday, October 28, 2012

Home Stretch

October is drawing to a close, the debates are over, and we are little more than a week away from the end of the 2012 presidential race.

The closer November 6th draws, the shriller the rhetoric gets.  Both candidates are hurling jabs at each other’s record and respective economic programs, while their acolytes in the chattering classes argue bitterly over everything from tax policy to healthcare to whether the administration acted appropriately on intelligence related to the Benghazi consulate attack. There has also been the inevitable pop culture spillover: Conservatives are up in arms over enfant auteur Lena Dunham’s suggestive pro-Obama video, and a clutch of concertgoers walked out on Madonna after she urged them to vote for the president during a performance.

The polls show we are just as divided as we’ve been for the past dozen years…Obama and Romney are tied at 48% among registered voters according to Gallup.  Ideologues aside, most of us will vote for the perceived lesser evil.  The other major contest, however, is the one most people aren’t paying attention to: the race for control of both houses of Congress.  But 468 separate races—for all 435 seats in the House of Representatives and the 33 Class I seats in the Senate—don’t hold nearly the media sway as the personality-driven choice we make every four years for the top job. 

We ignore the congressional elections because they seem irrelevant to daily concerns.  Perhaps they are in the larger scheme.  One could argue the same of the presidential race; we only believe it significant because of the attendant media saturation.  Our apathy is literally systemic.  The reason we don’t participate in politics, save to vote, is because we are effectively cut out of the policy making process.  At the national level (and at the state level too), the “iron triangle” of interest groups, bureaucrats, and legislators forms policy.  The things that affect us most directly—public school quality, whether there are enough cops on the street, and how soon the potholes on your street get fixed—are governed by largely anonymous local officials whose names we either skip on the ballot or vote for blindly without recognition.   

All the same, if voting is our only role within the existing system we should make the most of it.  As an engaged citizen, I’ll devote my efforts over the next few days to urging my neighbors and coworkers to take charge of their future and cast their ballot.  Starting now.  Let’s see, let me bring up my friends’ numbers on my phone here and…hmmm, it’s Sunday, I shouldn’t really bother them…oh, who am I kidding?  Game 4 of the World Series is on…can’t miss that.  I’ll make my calls tomorrow, sometime, maybe. 

Go Giants!   

Sunday, October 21, 2012

George McGovern (1922-2012)

Former Senator George McGovern has died.

His passing should make us consider what might have been.  McGovern is best remembered for having lost the 1972 presidential election to incumbent Richard Nixon in the biggest landslide in U.S. history. 

McGovern’s drubbing at the polls was an object demonstration of the American voter’s egregious lack of judgment.  Nixon’s resignation in disgrace a scant twenty-one months after his electoral triumph must have caused even the president’s most fervent supporters to kick themselves for their stupidity.  (On the other hand, maybe it didn't.  A political cartoon from that time shows two men at a bar, with one saying to the other, “Hey, Nixon’s no dummy.  If the American people wanted moral leadership, he’d give it to them.” The humor in that piece hits a little too close to home for comfort.)

McGovern was not perfect by any means; his quick repudiation of his first running mate Tom Eagleton after it was revealed Eagleton had once been treated for clinical depression being the best remembered example of his fallibility.  Nevertheless his defining characteristic was his fundamental decency, something lacking in virtually every presidential candidate for the last thirty years. 

McGovern, a decorated World War II veteran as well as an academic historian, was an early opponent of America’s involvement in the Vietnam War.  After one measure he sponsored to defund the war failed to pass, McGovern proclaimed, “This chamber reeks of blood!”  It is nearly impossible to imagine a member of Congress saying anything like that today about Afghanistan or any other of our recent wars.  Nixon, by contrast, promised to end the war during his 1968 campaign but only concluded the Paris Peace Accords with North Vietnam a few weeks before the 1972 election.  Unsurprisingly, both public and pundits forgot his foot-dragging and widely praised Nixon's success.  Nixon's saturnine, uncompromising style, which had worked against him throughout his political career, actually helped his cause in 1972.  Despite the Vietnam debacle, Nixon's silent majority had no patience for what they saw as anti-American ideas or the excesses of the '60s youth culture.  For them, a McGovern presidency would mean condoning what they held to be anathema.  

McGovern was a good guy. Unfortunately, good guys with ethics often finish last in this country.  In a culture where we strive to impose our will on each other and seek to impose it on the world, it is clear why he did not achieve this nation’s highest office.  As the man in the cartoon said, Americans aren’t interested in moral leadership. They want to be told they are the best, that they are always right, and that they are always blameless.  George McGovern’s plainspoken style conflicted with our self-image, reminding us that power does not necessarily equate with greatness. I only wish we had public servants like him today.   


© 2012 The Unassuming Scholar

Monday, October 8, 2012

Columbus Day

Today is Columbus Day, the federal holiday which commemorates a white guy who got lost and thought he landed in India.

Please consider signing an online petition to Congress in support of replacing Columbus Day with a holiday honoring Native Americans.  You can find the petition at http://www.petitiononline.com/indian/petition.html.

Tuesday, October 2, 2012

Eric Hobsbawm (1917-2012)

British historian and truth teller Eric Hobsbawm died yesterday at age 95.

Requiescat in pace.