My ambivalence comes from misgivings over the
law’s provenance. The individual
mandate, the controversial key provision upheld by SCOTUS, is its best-worst
aspect. Despite its allegedly
socialistic origins it creates a captive market for private insurers and was
the result of intensive lobbying by America’s Health Care Plans, PhRMA, and
other industry groups. The bill that
passed in the spring of 2010 is a Frankenstein’s monster of special interest
and pork barrel provisions that illustrate the darkest facets of our political
system. (PBS Frontline presented an excellent documentary on the bill’s
journey through Congress and the Obama administration’s frustrated efforts to
enact a comprehensive reform.)
Republican politicians, led by John Boehner, have already stirred an outcry from the right. To be
sure, the GOP faithful and a flagging Tea Party movement will get a lot of
mileage out of the Supreme Court’s decision in the months leading up to the
November general election. It helps that
many Americans, and not just those in “red” states, have a rather distorted idea of what the healthcare law does and its constitutional
implications.
Bring on the cynical pols, the pissed off
seniors raving about “death panels,” and the crackpots in tricorn hats…
No comments:
Post a Comment